For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. This page is also available as Markdown.

RTK, NTRIP or PPK?

How RTK, NTRIP and PPK differ, and which one fits your Astro or Alta X Gen 2 workflow.

A drone receiving GNSS signals from satellites while a base station on the ground sends live corrections

Standard GPS puts your aircraft within 1 to 3 m of its true position. GNSS corrections bring that down to centimeters. RTK, NTRIP and PPK are three ways to get those corrections, and each one solves a different problem. A common mistake is buying a base station before knowing which problem you actually have.

Short on time? Go to Which one should I use?

Relative accuracy is not absolute accuracy

Most RTK questions we get come down to this. "Centimeter accuracy" can mean two different things, and they come from different places.

Three targets: standard GPS scatters widely, relative accuracy is a tight cluster offset from the target, absolute accuracy is a tight cluster on the target
Same drone, three outcomes. The cross is the true position.

RTK always gives you the tight cluster. Whether that cluster lands on the cross depends on how well the base station knows its own position. A base that averages its position for a few minutes (Survey-In) gives you the middle target. A base on a surveyed point, an NTRIP network, or post-processed base data gives you the one on the right.

Live corrections vs. post-processing

RTK and NTRIP correct position during the flight, over a radio or internet link. PPK corrects it after the flight from log files, so there's no link to lose.

RTK and NTRIP send corrections live during flight; PPK merges base and aircraft log files after the flight
When each method applies corrections. The dashed line marks the end of the flight.

With RTK and NTRIP, corrections arrive while the aircraft is flying. That improves how it flies, but it also means a link dropout mid-flight shows up in your data. With PPK, the aircraft flies on standard GPS and every position is recalculated after landing from the complete log files. The math is the same, but none of it has to happen in real time.

Which one should I use?

Pick the tab that matches your site, then the one that matches your payload and accuracy needs.

1. Do you have internet or cell coverage at your site?

2. What are you flying?

2. What are you flying?

Comparison

Use case
Method
Trade-off

Stable position hold and consistent (relative) geotags at a site with no internet.

RTK Freefly RTK Base Station

One more device to carry, set up and power. Absolute position drifts unless the base is on a known point.

Absolute accuracy with the least equipment, at a site with cell or internet coverage.

NTRIP Subscription or free network, no hardware

Depends on coverage. A dropout mid-flight degrades the geotags for that part of the flight.

Survey-grade deliverables, or results that can't depend on a live link.

PPK A logging GNSS base, such as Emlid Reach

Accuracy comes after the flight, and there's a processing step back at your desk.

You may not need any of them

RTK became popular when drone GPS wasn't good enough for reliable position hold. Astro and Alta X Gen 2 hold position well on standard GPS. If you aren't producing measured deliverables, you likely don't need corrections at all.

Flying the Flux LiDAR?

Use NTRIP when you have coverage, or a logging base station with PPK when you don't. We don't recommend the Freefly RTK Base Station for Flux. Its position comes from Survey-In, so your scan's placement can be meters off.

Next steps

RTK and NTRIPPPK SoftwareFlux Lidar Payload

Not sure which fits your workflow? Contact us.

Last updated